Skip navigation
Contact No's - ROI 048 3755 1260  NI   028 3755 1260

The Debate

Much of the current debate revolves around the way in which land is cultivated and the willingness or otherwise to embrace new technology. In particular, there is a spectrum of opinion from those who believe intensive, high yield farming is a necessity to those who espouse low input, more extensive "organic" agriculture.

However, the arguments for and against a particular view are more nuanced than they seem at first sight. Most farmers today are thoughtful about how they manage their land and biodiversity, and approaches such as conservation agriculture are becoming increasingly popular. If global food security is to be improved, it is important that farmers have access to the products and benefits of all relevant and available technologies. Genetic modification enables the introduction of a range of useful traits - including pest and disease resistance or drought tolerance - into crop plants, leading to increased yields, reduced energy and chemical inputs and hence reduced environmental impacts. A stringent regulatory system has evolved to ensure that approved GM varieties are at least as safe as conventionally bred crops for health and the environment.

However, it is important that each individual GM crop is assessed objectively using sound scientific evidence to inform a risk/benefit analysis. Bringing sound science to the forefront in this way will prevent the emotive stories, so prevalent in the press, from dominating public opinion. Unlike genetic modification, which is a technique to produce new seed varieties, organic agriculture is a system of cultivation, with tightly defined rules about what inputs may be made.

Although the use of GM seed in organic agriculture is currently banned, there is no intrinsic scientific reason why this should be so. There could be very productive synergies between the two approaches in future. In the meantime, it is important that unproven assertions made about the benefits of organic agriculture and organic food are properly and scientifically evaluated. The position of the organic industry on GM is more about protecting market share by exploiting anti-GM campaigns than about rational science which permits crops to be grown with, fewer agrichemicals, less tillage and less fuel/energy.

Current Issues

Future costs of UK energy supply

The Scientific Alliance recently published part 1 of an examination of National Grid's Future Energy Scenarios, dealing with security of supply. We are now pleased to publish part 2 - cost of supply. The authors - Dr Capell Aris and Colin Gibson - conclude that building more gas and nuclear stations would be considerably less expensive than any of the NG scenarios, as well as offering better energy security.

What's New

14 October 2016: Read the new report by Dr Capell Aris, published jointly with the Adam Smith Institute - Solar power in Britain: the Impossible Dream