Skip navigation
Contact No's - ROI 048 3755 1260  NI   028 3755 1260

China renders emissions bid to reduce emissions futile; Letter in Scotland on Sunday, 20 January 2013

IT IS surprising that such an eminent scientist as Sir Ian Wilmut has been seduced by the renewable energy lobby into supporting the further spread of onshore wind farms (News, 13 January). Whatever the extent of links between carbon dioxide emissions, global warming and flooding, present renewable energy technologies will make no ­difference.

In reality, anything done to reduce emissions in Scotland, the UK more broadly or even the whole of the EU is more than offset by the new coal-fired power stations being built in China and other rapidly developing economies.

To make matters worse, even if the Chinese suddenly stopped investing in conventional generation and turned completely to wind farms, emissions savings would be modest; without economic energy storage systems on a massive scale (and these are not even on the horizon), the need for backup generation significantly limits the practical use of wind power.

If Scotland really wants a no-regrets, low carbon energy policy, the government needs to think seriously again about new nuclear power stations. Sir Ian rejects the technology as having “other hazards”, but nuclear has a very good track record. The actual harm caused by the Fukushima incident, for example, has been grossly overstated. Even what we now regard as nuclear waste is in fact a major untapped source of energy for the future.

It is time politicians realised they are despoiling the countryside and inflating electricity costs for no discernible benefit.

Martin Livermore, Scientific Alliance, St John’s Innovation Centre, Cambridge

 

Copyright Scotland on Sunday 2013

Current Issues


Future costs of UK energy supply

The Scientific Alliance recently published part 1 of an examination of National Grid's Future Energy Scenarios, dealing with security of supply. We are now pleased to publish part 2 - cost of supply. The authors - Dr Capell Aris and Colin Gibson - conclude that building more gas and nuclear stations would be considerably less expensive than any of the NG scenarios, as well as offering better energy security.

What's New

14 October 2016: Read the new report by Dr Capell Aris, published jointly with the Adam Smith Institute - Solar power in Britain: the Impossible Dream